History Club
Military history and past events only. Rants or inflamitory comments will be removed.
Hosted by Frank Amato
Michel Wittmann
Greg
Visit this Community
Oregon, United States
Member Since: April 12, 2002
entire network: 455 Posts
KitMaker Network: 149 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 03:21 AM UTC
I've said it before, Pak, and I'll say it again: Nazis were supermen only in their own minds. Many were brave, most were competent, a few exceptional. But "drive the Allies into the sea"? Never. Even 21st Panzer, closest to the front, never had a realistic shot of rolling up the beachhead. OK, let's say they rolled through the gap and reached the beach without getting mauled by typhoons and Thunderbolts. Now what? There you are with your several dozen tanks, looking at the pretty ocean. Also looking (LITERALLY) down the muzzles of about a hundred cruisers and detroyers, all of whom think that taking tanks under direct fire with 5-and 6-inch naval rifles is great sport. The vaunted panzers would have lasted about an hour, I think. Your romantic contention that "with proper support" Wittman could have reversed the Normandy invasion is sheer fantasy. What support would you consider proper? Air support would be nice, but the Luftwaffe was already decimated. Next. How about artillery? Great to have the big guns, but something with it's own mobility is REALLY what you need and most German artillery was horse-drawn. There's a pretty picture, horses and limbers plodding forward under concentrated naval bombardment. Or the vehicles themselves--you want everything to be a Tiger or a Panther? Fair enough. But what was built is all you get, fewer than 1500 Tigers and 5000 Panthers. Not nearly enough, no matter how good the crews. And not reliable enough anyway. Germans tanks we marvelously complex machines which possessed awesome firepower and protection. They also broke down a lot. Hard to drive somebody into the sea when the tank breaks. Yeah, I know it wasn't faulty design but a substantial degree of underdevelopment and poor manufacturing--including sabotage. But it doesn't matter. Their mechanical reliability was insufficient to accomplish the fantasy mission you describe. Do some more reading, Pak. There's a lot more to successful warfighting than individual prowess with one super weapon system. We managed to learn that better than anyone else. That's why we won.
Greg
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 05:01 AM UTC
greg, i see you missed my point. what you said is obvious to anyone who knows history. what i said and i re-iterate is: that if Wittmann had the support that the allies had, the germans would have pushed the allies back into the sea. ALSO, the germans were NOT supermen, just very good soldiers who were well lead. i do see the people who answered this thread as missing the main point, i wanted to know what people THOUGHT of Obersturmfuhrer Michel Wittmann and that is all.
thank you, chris
sourkraut
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Member Since: May 11, 2002
entire network: 602 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 05:03 AM UTC
that is a question we never know the answer to
staff_Jim
Staff MemberPublisher
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
New Hampshire, United States
Member Since: December 15, 2001
entire network: 12,571 Posts
KitMaker Network: 4,397 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 05:06 AM UTC
Greg,
I have to agree with your above post. The reality of the 1944 is that the Germans fate had already been sealed. In Africa, Greece, Italy, Russia, Yugoslavia, and elsewhere. I would love to see what the Germans were going to do for fuel had the war lasted even one more year.

And again....as I have said in other threads....even though I appriciate the sacrifice and valor of those on the ground, World War II (both PTO and ETO) was really won in the air. Without the air attacks of B-27s, 29s, Thunderbolts, and the protection of planes like the P-51 we would have had a much more difficult (but not nescessarily impossible) war on the ground.

I still like to build armor more though.

Jim
sourkraut
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Member Since: May 11, 2002
entire network: 602 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 06:14 AM UTC
i think we wore this one out
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 10:50 AM UTC
amen scott, still noone got my point
screamingeagle
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Member Since: January 08, 2002
entire network: 1,027 Posts
KitMaker Network: 269 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 12:41 PM UTC

Quoted Text


And again....as I have said in other threads....even though I appriciate the sacrifice and valor of those on the ground, World War II (both PTO and ETO) was really won in the air. Without the air attacks of B-27s, 29s, Thunderbolts, and the protection of planes like the P-51 we would have had a much more difficult (but not nescessarily impossible) war on the ground.

I still like to build armor more though.

Jim



Hi Jim - sorry but I totally disagree. Like i said before it was a full military invasion.
A team effort with credit going to all. Where would those air-assaults be with out
infantry & armor divisions to advance & flush out the enemy and hold positions.
And then commit to further offensives ?
I don't want to make this long winded so i'll stop here.
- ralph
screamingeagle
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Member Since: January 08, 2002
entire network: 1,027 Posts
KitMaker Network: 269 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 01:31 PM UTC

Quoted Text

greg, i see you missed my point. what you said is obvious to anyone who knows history. what i said and i re-iterate is: that if Wittmann had the support that the allies had, the germans would have pushed the allies back into the sea. ALSO, the germans were NOT supermen, just very good soldiers who were well lead. i do see the people who answered this thread as missing the main point, i wanted to know what people THOUGHT of Obersturmfuhrer Michel Wittmann and that is all.
thank you, chris



Pak, this is what you can expect on any forum where not only are there good modelers
but good modelers who have done years of historical research on W.W.II.
A very simple opiniated statement like you made about your hero, will generate
a lot of controversy. Especially where you have a bunch of good ole Patriotic Americans
who knew we won the war by good courageous Soldiers & Commanders who were more than capable of defeating Nazi Germany.
Do you actually think if your Wittman and his lunatic, coward commanders like Hitler, Goring
Himmler, even Jocheim Peiper ( though he was a great Tanker but was full of Hitler beliefs and a murderer of American POW's ) won the war that they
would have let us Americans enjoy all our freedoms & go on living as we do ?
Do you think we would of been building models & posting messages on model forums ?
Think about it. The world would have been a very different and miserable place to be
born if that Nazi Regime and dreams of "A Thousand Year Riech" had succeeded.
You and I ( if ever even born ) would of been slave labor and seen as inferiors to the Arian Race of Nazi Supremecy ! - So I say to you think about that.
As to your original question: Michael Wittman was a brilliant Tank Commander. Also a loyal, brave, courageous soldier. But was he the best ? - That is very arguable, and will be forever in military history....................
- ralph

sourkraut
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Member Since: May 11, 2002
entire network: 602 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 08:21 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

greg, i see you missed my point. what you said is obvious to anyone who knows history. what i said and i re-iterate is: that if Wittmann had the support that the allies had, the germans would have pushed the allies back into the sea. ALSO, the germans were NOT supermen, just very good soldiers who were well lead. i do see the people who answered this thread as missing the main point, i wanted to know what people THOUGHT of Obersturmfuhrer Michel Wittmann and that is all.
thank you, chris


thats what i love about this site,its a great place for historical research

Pak, this is what you can expect on any forum where not only are there good modelers
but good modelers who have done years of historical research on W.W.II.
A very simple opiniated statement like you made about your hero, will generate
a lot of controversy. Especially where you have a bunch of good ole Patriotic Americans
who knew we won the war by good courageous Soldiers & Commanders who were more than capable of defeating Nazi Germany.
Do you actually think if your Wittman and his lunatic, coward commanders like Hitler, Goring
Himmler, even Jocheim Peiper ( though he was a great Tanker but was full of Hitler beliefs and a murderer of American POW's ) won the war that they
would have let us Americans enjoy all our freedoms & go on living as we do ?
Do you think we would of been building models & posting messages on model forums ?
Think about it. The world would have been a very different and miserable place to be
born if that Nazi Regime and dreams of "A Thousand Year Riech" had succeeded.
You and I ( if ever even born ) would of been slave boys and inferiors to the Arian Race of Nazi Supremecy ! - So I say to you think about that.
As to your original question: Michael Wittman was a brilliant Tank Commander. Also a loyal, brave, courageous soldier. But was he the best ? - That is very arguable, and will be forever in military history....................
- ralph


Posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 - 11:54 PM UTC
i am very well versed in military history myself, from Thutmose lll to Schwarzkopf. and i know about nazi tyranny. still that is not my point, oh well.

americans also shot german pow's.
sourkraut
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Member Since: May 11, 2002
entire network: 602 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 12:20 AM UTC
its seems that more and more opinions are coming into this thread and not historical fact #:-)
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 12:37 AM UTC
to scott, amen to that brother
m60a3
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Member Since: March 08, 2002
entire network: 778 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 01:24 AM UTC
[quote]i would like to state (in my humble opinion) ...quote]
Opinion is what started the thread.
Arthur
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Member Since: March 13, 2002
entire network: 2,454 Posts
KitMaker Network: 489 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 03:01 AM UTC

Quoted Text

i would like to state (in my humble opinion) that Obersturmfuhrer Wittmann was the finest tank commander of WWll. proof: 138 tanks and 132 anti-tank guns destroyed.

"Ob Sturm oder Schneit...................


Ithink this is what started the debate
Arthur
AmAlba Mannich #:-)
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 03:32 AM UTC
i said "in my humble opinion" so i wouldn't sound egotistical, i am not a selfish person. sorry if that opened a door that was not meant to be opened. my apologizies to everyone.
chris
Arthur
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Member Since: March 13, 2002
entire network: 2,454 Posts
KitMaker Network: 489 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 03:59 AM UTC
Chris...dont apologise my friend,its a good debate
Arthur
Am Alba Mannich :-)
sourkraut
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Member Since: May 11, 2002
entire network: 602 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 04:07 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

i would like to state (in my humble opinion) that Obersturmfuhrer Wittmann was the finest tank commander of WWll. proof: 138 tanks and 132 anti-tank guns destroyed.

"Ob Sturm oder Schneit...................


Ithink this is what started the debate
Arthur
AmAlba Mannich #:-)


you maybe right ,but it turned out to be a discussion of historical fact
screamingeagle
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Member Since: January 08, 2002
entire network: 1,027 Posts
KitMaker Network: 269 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 09:30 AM UTC

Quoted Text

americans also shot german pow's.



Absolutely correct, in a very few cases it was of legitamate reason, like
what Skorzeny did during "The Bulge" and Peiper & his men did at Malmedy ( Baugnez to be exact ).
BUT, I think it's a shame of killing a defenseless
soldier/POW no matter who's side he is on.
One case was in Holland during Op.Market Garden.
Americans killed some Germans POW's - It upset me very much.

- ralph
TreadHead
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Member Since: January 12, 2002
entire network: 5,000 Posts
KitMaker Network: 1,210 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 11:32 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Chris...dont apologise my friend,its a good debate
Arthur
Am Alba Mannich :-)



....Absolutely!.........I'm just sorry I came in at the END!..............damn!

Tread.

TreadHead
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Member Since: January 12, 2002
entire network: 5,000 Posts
KitMaker Network: 1,210 Posts
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 11:33 AM UTC
My thanks go out to you Pak for starting such a fervent thread!

............can we do it again?...........
Posted: Thursday, May 30, 2002 - 12:26 PM UTC
treadhead, feel free to add your two cents........ :-)
TreadHead
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Member Since: January 12, 2002
entire network: 5,000 Posts
KitMaker Network: 1,210 Posts
Posted: Sunday, June 02, 2002 - 01:22 AM UTC
O.K.....here's a farthing's worth just to 'stir the soup'

Staff Sargeant Pool was an incredible American hero. His greatest talent? Tenacity.
Now, that said. In Pool's own words regarding his Gunner Wilis Oller, "He could shoot the eyebrows off a knat". So, who exactly made all those kills, Pool, the tenacious TC who almost invariably always rode on the outside of his tank, or Willis Oller, the man behind that big long tube thingie where the shells come out and go Boom!?!

Just a question.

Tread.

How's that Pak?
Tankera1
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Member Since: May 05, 2002
entire network: 138 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Sunday, June 02, 2002 - 06:27 AM UTC
[quote]So, who exactly made all those kills, Pool, the tenacious TC who almost invariably always rode on the outside of his tank, or Willis Oller, the man behind that big long tube thingie where the shells come out and go Boom!?!

Just a question.

Tread.

A tank crew is first, formost, and always a team. The tank crew made the kills.
TreadHead
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Member Since: January 12, 2002
entire network: 5,000 Posts
KitMaker Network: 1,210 Posts
Posted: Sunday, June 02, 2002 - 07:44 AM UTC
Can't argue with that.

Out of curiosity, were all 258 enemy vehicles shooting back at him and not lined up in a row? Were these direct engagements with armed and fueled targets?
Assuming he fought every single day of those 80 days, that means he directly engaged approx. 4 superior vehicles @ day, and destroyed them. And this guy never got a MOH?

Tread.

I would love to know the details of his record.

3 tanks shot out from under him & his crew huh? Didn't he lose one almost before he cleared the beach?
m60a3
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Member Since: March 08, 2002
entire network: 778 Posts
KitMaker Network: 0 Posts
Posted: Sunday, June 02, 2002 - 07:59 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Can't argue with that.

Out of curiosity, were all 258 enemy vehicles shooting back at him and not lined up in a row? Were these direct engagements with armed and fueled targets?
Assuming he fought every single day of those 80 days, that means he directly engaged approx. 4 superior vehicles @ day, and destroyed them. And this guy never got a MOH?

Tread.

I would love to know the details of his record.

3 tanks shot out from under him & his crew huh? Didn't he lose one almost before he cleared the beach?


Tread,

Here's the best link to SSG Pool:
http://www.3ad.org/wwii_heroes/pool_lafayette/pool_home.htm
Enjoy the story of a true American hero.